.
Feedback

Photo Id's Monta Vista High Teacher Threatened in Graffiti

A photo of the graffiti at Lynbrook identifies the Monta Vista High School teacher threatened in the vandalism.

UPDATE as of 2 p.m. Thursday: Patch has received reports of graffiti at multiple schools, not just Lynbrook High School. One former Kennedy Middle School student says the vandalized wall in the attached picture is actually Kennedy, not Lynbrook. Patch will continue to follow this and provide updates. This article has been edited to reflect the change.

UPDATE: As of 11:40 a.m. the Sheriff's office reopened the closed roads and reported it did not find any explosives or suspicious items.

Graffiti scrawled in a light, bright blue on the side of a school building that was reported early Thursday morning and caused the shut down of two nearby schools specifically named a Monta Vista High School teacher in the threat.

“I planted a bomb at Monta Vista to kill Matt Brashears,” is written in what appears to be spray paint as seen in a photo attached to this article. The photo was sent anonymously to Cupertino Patch.

Brashears is a teacher in the English department at Monta Vista according to the school website.

“(Brashears) has got to be the nicest, most non-threatening person in the world!!!” wrote one mother of a Monta Vista student on Facebook.

Santa Clara County Sheriff’s bomb squad was scouring the school campus early Thursday after closing multiple intersections around the school and turning away students arriving for their first classes.

Next-door Lincoln Elementary school, which is not believed to be part of the threat, was closed for safety precautions.

The City of Cupertino reported around 11:30 a.m. that McClellan Road was reopened at the conclusion of the Sheriff's office investigation.

Kennedy Middle School, part of the tri-school daily traffic jam, remained open as authorities did not deem it at risk, according to Cupertino Union School District spokesman Jeremy Nishihara. A note to parents by CUSD Superintendent Wendy Gudalewicz said: “Out of an abundance of caution, we also kept students off of the upper field at Kennedy Middle School.”

Editor's note: When this article first was pubished the information came from police and school officials. It was unknown by Patch at the time that graffiti was also at Kennedy Middle School, and has also been reported to be seen at the 7-11 at McClellan and Bubb.

San Jose Police received a call from someone at Lynbrook, which is located almost four miles from Monta Vista in San Jose, reporting threatening graffiti on a wall at Lynbrook. It is unclear why the threat to Brashears was painted on Lynbrook and not Monta Vista, where he works, or neighboring Lincoln. Police declined comment because the investigation is ongoing.

Both Lynbrook and Monta Vista are part of the Fremont Union High School District.

Upon investigation San Jose Police determined a potential threat existed at Monta Vista and called the Sheriff’s communication office around 6:39 a.m. at which time deputies were dispatched and are now conducting a thorough campus-wide sweep with specially trained dogs.

A search was done at Lynbrook by San Jose police—it is unclear how extensive the search was—and SJPD Officer Albert Morales said the school was not shut down nor were roads closed as a result of the vandalism since the threat was determined to be focused on Brashears at Monta Vista.

News helicopters buzzed overhead in the normally quiet neighborhood surrounding Monta Vista and Lincoln, and school personnel could be seen standing in one of the school’s parking lots as bomb squads searched the campus.

No further information or comment was given by Fremont Union High School District Superintendent Polly Bove.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Cupertino Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Pam Marino December 14, 2012 at 04:53 am
I realized a little while ago about the logo. I served as a guest editor in the past and completely forgot it's attached. I apologize if it caused any confusion.
Linda Orvick December 14, 2012 at 12:22 pm
Understanding the realities of social media today, I find it disheartening that our local news entity is not doing all it can to protect this man's identity when national news organizations are. He is a beloved teacher at our high school. He and his young family are enduring something that is frightening and we as a community should be standing by him. "Other people are doing it" is something we hear from our children. Posting a picture that was received anonymously doesn't sound very professional. What if the posting of this picture hampers the investigation? Is that okay, as long as it's in the name of journalism?
Anne Ernst (Editor) December 14, 2012 at 03:12 pm
I have removed the link to his school page, but it's worth noting that you can still get to the school's page publicly. They removed his image from the main staff page but if you click on his name, his page is still there and so is the photo of he and his child.
Anne Ernst (Editor) December 14, 2012 at 03:21 pm
There is no link to his "personal" contact info, and there never has been. Any links or photos or anything in any of these articles were things obtained publicly. In fact, you can't get more public than the graffiti itself. It was on a public school wall, and now it turns out it was on more than one public wall; something that was not shared with me by officials at the time. Facebook has much farther reach than does this Patch and both of the photos sent to Patch came off of Facebook pages.
I certainly understand the concern and do have compassion for him and his family and hope you understand that I would never have published anything that I thought put them in danger. If the images and information had come to me through any other means I would not have published it, but at the time of publishing was receiving comments from multiple people, parents included, who thought this may be a prank, not something that was a real threat. The fact that SJPD did not fully investigate Lynbrook also led to the belief that this was not a serious threat.
Anne Ernst (Editor) December 14, 2012 at 03:34 pm
I don't think it's a matter of whether publishing his name was "necessary" or not; it was simply a matter of providing the public with information that came to me in a very public manner. There is no personal or private information about this teacher or his family in the articles. The teacher's page with he and his son is on the school website, which is hardly a private location. The photos were on Facebook, which though you may like to think has some privacy controls really does not and the fact that the photos were obtained through Facebook illustrates that we all need to be cognizant of what we put out there. I would not publish anything that would jeopardize this man, or his family's safety. All the information and images came to me in a very public manner. The simple fact that there were at least two photos taken of the graffiti at Kennedy—a public school—and that there was more graffiti at Lynbrook—a public school—and now there are reports that there was graffiti at Cupertino High and possibly other public buildings all speak to how very public this is already. It's also worth noting that at the time of publishing it was unknown that the graffiti was widespread and there was indication that this was a prank.
Mike Darwin December 14, 2012 at 03:38 pm
Folks - the name is out there on Facebook and elsewhere. Are you asking FB to delete his name and critcizing everyone for posting his picture? Removing his name will not protect his privacy!
Anne Ernst (Editor) December 14, 2012 at 03:40 pm
Frank, as I've mentioned in other replies at the time of publishing I was under the impression this was an incident of a prankster. Though I would like to think that this Patch, as you say "has more public exposure than do Facebook and Twitter" I can assure you it does not. Without being "friends" with people on Facebook I was able to get more information on this incident than you can imagine. It's all dependent on the Facebook user's privacy control settings. Users who do not have tight control settings leave their own information and even some of their friends information open to public exposure. Again, I would not ever jeopardize anyone's safety, and I think you know that.
A concerned parent December 14, 2012 at 03:41 pm
I must say that it is a bit harsh to blame local news reporters on writing about the teacher. It is wishful thinking that his name could have remained anonymous in this connected world. My daughter is in Monta Vista and their chats were all about this poor chap who has been singled out. My heart goes out to him and his family.
Why don't parents and concerned people focus on the fact that perhaps a mentally imbalance kid is attending classes with kids like my own. I would like to believe it is a prank.....but after todays's headlines about CT, my heart is in my mouth and my feet and phone are ready to make a dash for school should anything stir. What is even more concerning is that though there was graffiti on the walls of Kennedy Middle School, the Cupertino Union School District decided to keep the school open. A thousand students and teachers exposed to a possible threat for what? A concerned parent.
Anne Ernst (Editor) December 14, 2012 at 03:51 pm
Dear "a concerned parent" I thank you for bringing to light what in my opinion is the larger concern. In my discussions with officials early yesterday I was never told about the multiple incidences of graffiti. SJPD said they were not fully investigating Lynbrook, and when I questioned them about why someone would post graffiti on a school almost four miles away and not on MV or next-door Lincoln the response was "that's a good question." Had I been given ANY indication that this was widespread or as serious as it may have been I would not have published the name of the teacher.
That said, your question as to why Kennedy and Lynbrook and Cupertino High were all kept open is a question for officials, but I would have to trust that they would never have put a single student or staff member in jeopardy if they had an inkling of a serious threat.
Claire December 14, 2012 at 10:53 pm
I completely agree with this, as police have advised against directly stating his name for this is still an ongoing investigation. As for the "other people are doing it" part, the "other people" are mostly students on Facebook and Twitter, who forget that putting his name up could hamper with the investigation and his privacy. As far as I know, this website isn't run by children.
Ames December 14, 2012 at 11:04 pm
At this point I do not think it is a stretch to question the professionalism or lack of exhibited by this website. This poor teacher has been surrounded by police and media vans clambering for his attention for over a day and he deserves some respite. Again, this website is the only one that has published his name. If this is not a serious case, why put up his name at all? However, this shouldn't even be a question as this is still and ongoing case and publicizing details of the victim is in extremely bad taste. In addition, some staff at Monta Vista have requested that details about this teacher or this case not be spread beyond the immediate community. This website is going against the wishes of the people who are most involved in this case and unnecessarily drawing attention to the plight of this teacher.
Social media should not be abused this way. Even if the teacher's information is on Facebook, most people would not search it up as they frankly don't care if they are not in this immediate community, and removing it from this website would spare a young family from more exposure.
Ames December 14, 2012 at 11:09 pm
Of course much information is public, but that is a moot point. Just because you CAN search up almost anything about someone on the Internet, doesn't mean you SHOULD do it. Most people who are NOT involved in the community will NOT spend time searching up the name of this teacher and will simply move on. Those who do are most likely involved within this community. Few people will take the time to go on a school website and search up a teacher's name, or go on Facebook and track down his entire life story. However, those who read this article will find out who he is and his involvement of this case, and I really think that this is an unnecessary and stressful intrusion into his life.
Criez December 14, 2012 at 11:22 pm
I would like to note that if you Google Matt Brashears, this article pops up. Not the Monta Vista Page, the Facebook profile that pops up isn't even his. The school itself has removed his pictures.
Unless you are very close to him, ex: a student, teacher, chances are that you won't even find him on Facebook unless it's on Rate My Teacher. Does this article really need to be the first thing that pops up when someone searches his name, even though there was no other connection until now? I'm not blaming, I'm just asking for his name to be taken down. And there were many police officers patrolling the area around there, I'm thankful for their quick response. For now, I shall end up focusing my attention to today's news.
Tiff December 14, 2012 at 11:26 pm
i think you should take his name off in consideration for him and his family
Bella December 14, 2012 at 11:26 pm
The author of this article is, by all means, entitled to reveal the man's name. however, seeing as no others do, and we have here a host of concerned community for this man's safety and, it is common courtesy to give him and his family the utmost privacy, especially since this kind of thing is rare here, and that he and his family are quite shaken. Of course nobody can force it, but it's just plain old respect. So would the author of this article, or whoever is authorized to, please remove his name. Now.
anon December 15, 2012 at 12:05 am
Not smart of you to put his name up. Use common sense. would you want your name out there if you got a death threat?
Anne Ernst (Editor) December 15, 2012 at 12:19 am
I understand everybody's concern for a beloved teacher, and I feel for him and his family, but there needs to be a sense of reality here. Can somebody please explain how publishing a name is a "threat"? I recognize the emotion attached to this subject, but I would like for someone to explain how saying a name can possibly be threatening. How is it any different than when we write about someone who does volunteer work? We've published many names associated with volunteer work and there have even been people with much more personal information presented in articles, but it's not considered a threat to someone's safety. If we posted a threat to Barack Obama's safety, would the same criticism be levied?
Ames December 15, 2012 at 12:38 am
I am in disbelief that you could relate being the victim of a death threat to being applauded for doing volunteer work. Nobody wishes to be associated with a crime, while helping the community is universally recognized as an admirable task. This teacher by no means did anything wrong, but would anyone want to be known as the victim of a crime? Once his name is released, it could also lead to backlash from students who potentially do not like him and it could leave people free to pass judgment on this person. Victims of an attack or a potential attack should have their identities protected so they can move on with their lives and not have to deal with the consequences of someone else's stupid actions.
Diane Hu December 15, 2012 at 12:47 am
I think I speak for most people when I say that I want to keep something like this, a public death threat levied against me with malicious intent, private, and not have strangers gawking over what happened to me.
At Monta Vista, all our teachers today have respectfully declined from mentioning his name, and asked that we do the same. The consensus from the MV community is that has he been deeply affected by this incident, and would like to keep its impact on his life as minimal as possible- whether he knows about this article or not, this can't be helping. If you seriously want to keep his name up on this website, I ask that you please at least consult him and ask his permission; it's the least you could do for him, after the very bad turn his life has taken. Does volunteer work involve malicious intent and danger to your life? You're connecting two different occurences that aren't on the same planet of severity- even if this was a prank or a hoax, it's still a threat to your life from a stranger posted publicly for everyone to see. Please; I know this teacher and many of my friends have this teacher; we are all concerned for him. I don't know much about the newspaper-writing process, but could you spare the time it takes to change your article? I don't think it'll be too much skin off your nose, and the Monta Vista community would deeply appreciate your compassion.
Criez December 15, 2012 at 12:51 am
Barack Obama is a public figure/nation head, who chose to be a political public figure. He understands and knows the threats that he will have to deal with. This man is a teacher, a small TOWN teacher, who did not choose to be a public figure.
That's like comparing a Hollywood celebrity to a family man. A death threat is not something you want to be associated with. Someone might take a glance at that phrase and the teacher's name and assume that he might have been a bad teacher or such. What is the difference you say, between volunteer work and a death threat? One is beneficial to the community, it is a "group", while the other is a very threat to their "selves"/lives. Whose articles? Media, NOT SOCIAL MEDIA, generally do not release the victim's names. And again, this article is the only one that comes up when you search his name.
Claire December 15, 2012 at 01:06 am
Your logic in using Barack Obama as an analogy is flawed, When Obama stepped up to be president, he knew he was going to face death threats, because when he stepped up for that role, he knew it would make him the most famous public figure. When this teacher stepped up to educate people, he did not know he was stepping up to face death threats, because he wasn't. He only wanted to be a teacher for his students. This man is not a public figure, and no matter how you argue that, there are many sources that state that in most circumstances, teachers are not public figures. Do not make this the exception. Even now, formally, he is not a public figure, as no other news stations have mentioned his name, except yours.
Also, someone else has stated above, that this site is no less professional than any other website. As of now, I do not agree, because this is the difference between an amateur and a professional website. A professional newspaper would have taken everything into consideration and not have had his name up. A professional newspaper would have not gone this far arguing with its readers. A professional newspaper author knows when to admit a fault, rather then keep pride, because it shows maturity and willingness to be a community with their community and readers. The most basic classes on journalism states the boundaries of publicity and its circumstances. It is not only the choice of the author, it involves logical and emotional thinking about everyone involved.
Connie December 15, 2012 at 02:26 am
Hey it shouldn't take too long to remove a tag, change a picture, and a name. Why are you so insistent on leaving this information out? We're all reasonable people. All we're asking is that you help us protect this teacher's privacy. He's going through a difficult time and we should all do our best to help him.
Pradnya Narkhede December 15, 2012 at 02:53 am
I agree with my peers! Even our teachers at school today, while aware that all the students and faculty knew about the situation already, told us to refrain from saying the teacher's name out loud or publicizing it anymore. I don't care to analyze how grossly incorrect whatever analogies made aforementioned are, as others have made the point before me. The Monta Vista community has been, to say the least, shaken by this incident, and I can only imagine what this teacher must be experiencing right now. Instead of passive-aggressive arguing, please display some semblance of professionalism & proactiveness and remove the name of this teacher, whom several of my friends have, or, as Diane said, at least ask for his permission. The Monta Vista community would really appreciate your respecting of this teacher's privacy as he - and the rest of us - collectively recuperate from this incident.
Frank Geefay December 15, 2012 at 03:32 am
Perhaps the Patch should ask the teacher how he feels about this Patch article then attempt to accommodate his wishes.
qwerty December 15, 2012 at 05:11 am
I believe that the Patch should take off the teacher's name for his privacy and safety. We should consider the situation that he is in as of now and try to help him as much as possible.
Frank Geefay December 15, 2012 at 06:23 am
Anne, there are a few differences between the other names you publish and this teacher. Most names you publish are done in a favorable light where the person would not mind being named. Most people you mention are of limited interest in scope to a small segment of our community. In this case the teacher was not mentioned in a favorable context, rather was a victim, and the scope of interest in this article was Bay Area wide or beyond. It was mentioned in all of the Bay Area media as a major story. Had the Connecticut tragedy not overwhelmed the media it might still have been a waning media topic. The other distinguishing thing is that of all the media that broke this story all but the Patch conspicuously omitted the teacher's name out of respect for his privacy as a teacher, who might be teaching the very student that did him public harm and perhaps intended that his/her teacher receive bad press just to get back at him for giving bad grades. This is a rather unique local story that requires more considerate handling.
Social networks are notorious gossip machines which have little social responsibility or value. I believe that local news media which caters more to a specific community should have more sensitivity to local feelings. The fact that other more remote news media had greater sensitivity than the Cupertino Patch to a Cupertino news event seem counterproductive for a local media that wants to maintain a close relationship with the community it serves.
Linda Orvick December 15, 2012 at 02:20 pm
Unbelievable - Anne, you are completely missing the point. This is clearly not up for discussion. It's your news source and you get to print whatever you want. Good to know!
anon December 15, 2012 at 03:28 pm
patch should take off the teacher's name for his own privacy.
true, many people already who it is, but it is still wrong for his name to be publiclized. people who have published this on facebook and tumblr have already been asked to remove it. PLEASE TAKE OFF his name. it is a violation of his privacy. it already sucks to have schools closed down on on own's behalf, and this is just too much.
anon December 15, 2012 at 03:33 pm
Agreed. Although it is already publicized in many sites, many of the photos have already been taken down. I would honestly prefer that the name and link to be removed. This is a violation of his privacy. The teacher has already been through enough- he does not need for more publicity like this.
anonymous December 16, 2012 at 04:13 pm
Hey, I've got an idea, I'll close the browser window and go to a Real news source. Part time editors, AOL posing as a news source? Pictures at eleven? Anyone who lives in Cupertino knows who the teacher is, your stubbornness at removing this person's identity is comic. This is not like hiding deepthroat from the federal government. Stop pretending to be journalists, and go sell some ads.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Marc Gottlieb June 2, 2013 at 04:01 pm
PS: Ideally, everybody will be able to sign up at the college website. But I have to acknowledgeRead More that some of the language may not be perfectly as clear as we'd like, especially if this is your first enrollment. So, if you need any assistance (or maybe aren't computer-savvy) the very nice Registrar Office people can assist you on 650/574-6165. Just tell them you want to sign up for Summer semester, Real Estate Practice 110 class, Course Reference number 54642 and that you'd like to complete the enrollment today. You'll like the class, and CSM, once we get you in! ALL WELCOME! Thank you!
A Chinese-American couple will dress just like their mainstream American counterparts at the wedding.
Priyanka Sharma-Sindhar April 27, 2011 at 08:21 pm
This is definitely very useful for the those of us who aren't Chinese, but do have Chinese friends..Read More Thank you, Crystal. What are the popular spots in Cupertino for Chinese weddings?
Crystal Tai May 1, 2011 at 06:28 pm
Thank you very much for you kind words, Priyanka! The answer to your question is in another articleRead More I wrote for Cupertino Patch, "Five Wedding Reception Venues in Cupertino." Thanks again!