.
Feedback

Governor Signs High-Speed Rail Funding Bill

Law unlocks billions in funding for high-speed rail, Caltrain and BART.

Governor Jerry Brown this morning signed the High-Speed Rail funding bill and will do so again this afternoon in San Francisco.

The bill, S.B. 1029, unlocks $4.7 billion in funding via the sale of state bonds approved by California voters 2008.  The funding will go in part to modernizing Caltrain and other regional transportation systems, and will be matched by a $7.9 billion investment from federal and local dollars.

“This legislation will help put thousands of people in California back to work,” said Governor Brown in a statement Wednesday. “By improving regional transportation systems, we are investing in the future of our state and making California a better place to live and work.”

Brown signed the legislation at Union Station in Los Angeles, and will have another ceremonial signing at the site of the new Transbay Terminal in San Francisco Wednesday afternoon. 

Both stations will serve as termini for the high-speed rail line.

The legislation authorizes $700 million in state funding for electrifying Caltrain by 2019, and will be matched with $2 billion in additional federal and local funding. This is on top of funding authorized for building a light rail connection in Southern California linking Metro transit to Union Station.

“I am very pleased the Governor has signed legislation authorizing the first leg of construction for California’s High Speed Rail Project,” said Speaker John A. Pérez. “This ambitious project will create thousands of jobs and generate billions of dollars for our state, and my colleagues and I have been very pleased to work with the Governor to keep this project moving forward.”

“California’s transit system cannot stagnate because the facts are unforgiving: 20 million additional residents by 2050,” said Senate pro Tem Darrell Steinberg. “You can pave farmlands with new roads and blackout skies with airplanes but the air we breathe will be no better than a tailpipe. This project brings an infusion of energy into rural areas of high unemployment and provides relief for urban traffic gridlock. Most importantly, it’s an investment in California’s future.”

The initial segment of high-speed rail will begin construction in 2013 and link Merced to the San Fernando Valley. The California High-Speed Rail Authority and the Governor’s office claim this will create 100,000 job-years of employment in five years, equivalent to 20,000 full-time jobs annually, but those number are disputed by watchdog groups, including Palo Alto’s Californians Advocating Responsible Rail Design.

SB 1029 also includes money for replacing train cars on BART and implementing Positive Train Control, an automated system for controlling trains designed to stop collisions.

The total investment in Northern California transportation projects unlocked by SB 1029 totals $3.6 billion, according to the Governor’s office. Southern California will get $2.8 billion, and the Central Valley will get $6 billion.

The legislation also ratchets up the reporting requirements on the High-Speed Rail Authority, a move designed to boost accountability, manage project risks, and keep construction on schedule and within budget.

Follow us on Twitter | Like us on Facebook | Get our daily newsletterBlog for us

Frank Geefay July 19, 2012 at 03:59 am
This may sound like a lot of money but like BART, Caltrain, and other mass transit systems we will be thankful we have it in 15 years. This means jobs for Californians for the next decade or more for those working on the project and from service companies and fallout developments along the track in the central valley where unemployment is high. It will bring isolated communities closer to LA and the Bay Area. Thank goodness for federal assistance. Without it high speed rail would have been a distant dream.
Gary E. Jones July 19, 2012 at 08:53 pm
Devil's Advocate/pessimist: Would it have been a better cost to benefit to expand the many light rail systems in the state already in place? You know, put in more local transit systems too, to reduce the carbon footprint right now. Maybe some toll roads too. I can think of a whole lot of other uses for that money than putting in this rail line. The way our state does things the project will probably turn out to be a bust from overruns, using out of the country contractors, steel and the actual trains manufactured in another country, and on and on. I can’t wait to read the article 10 years from now about the fraud and waste from a corrupt official taking kickbacks or dishonest contractor or vendor. My prediction is that this project is going to turn out to be the biggest "Rube Goldberg" this state has ever seen. Check back with me in just 5 years to review my prediciton here.
Gary E. Jones July 19, 2012 at 09:00 pm
By way of example: http://sfpublicpress.org/news/2009-12/unparalleled-bridge-unprecedented-cost
Gary E. Jones July 19, 2012 at 09:07 pm
In short; I liken this project to a foreclosed homeowner (California has a $19 billion dollar budget shortfall and growing) building two bedrooms and a bath onto the house just before the sheriff knocks on their door. Don't get me wrong; I would love to have a high speed rail in California; but, we cannot afford it, nor can the Feds afford giving us the money to help. Where is fiscal responsibility in this country?
Frank Geefay July 25, 2012 at 02:15 pm
I don't see this project ever happening without this one time stimulus money from the Fed. It's an opportunity to stimulate jobs and tax revenues directly and indirectly from underdeveloped areas of the State with high unemployment and to spur housing growth in these communities where people can quickly commute to jobs far from home.
Money will go to existing transit systems and expansions over time. As a matter of fact some of the money in this Bill will go to other transit systems. This is a one time shot at something that might be the big economic stimulus that we badly need. But I will concede that it is a bit of a gamble. The die has been cast by the governor's signature so we should make the best of it and not try to sabotage it or we really will be wasting money.
Gary E. Jones July 25, 2012 at 02:29 pm
We'll see Frank. I will prey you are right. No more negative on this, "the die is cast."
Frank Geefay July 25, 2012 at 03:37 pm
I'm sorry but I don't quite see this analogy fitting the High Speed Rail situation. No one is talking about the State foreclosing on its debts. High Speed Rail money will come from a variety of sources: the Fed, State, bonds, etc.
As for fiscal responsibility, it doesn't mean stop spending on everything if you are in the red. Fiscal responsibility means spend wisely and collect tax revenues fairly. If you are in the red then you must collect taxes at a faster rate than you spend. Collecting taxes fairly doesn't means that the net tax rates for the very rich should be lower than everyone else as is generally the case today. It means that those who can most afford it and are least impacted from it should pay more of their share of taxes. This will go a long way towards balancing our budget. The middle class has been stuck with the majority of the tab far too long. I consider anyone making more than $500,000 per year rich. California has a lot of not just rich but insanely rich people. We must start balancing our attention upon increasing taxes for the rich just as we have been on cutting the budget. But you don’t hear much about raising taxes for the rich. The very rich want us to focus our attention solely on cutting the budget so they can get away scot-free, and we the middle class allow them the power to detract our attention from them!
Gary E. Jones July 25, 2012 at 10:25 pm
Here we go already, sounds like the first cost overrun in the making to the plan already, and so soon:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/48304937/ns/local_news-bakersfield_ca/t/senator-wants-delay-high-speed-rail-project/#.UBCbomt5mK0
Gary E. Jones July 25, 2012 at 10:27 pm
NIMBY . Not in my back yard syndrome.
Gary E. Jones July 25, 2012 at 10:28 pm
Sorry you don't get the analogy Frank, give it some time.
Anne Ernst (Editor) July 26, 2012 at 04:26 am
These things are always a painful process. But they are a process, and hopefully that leads to progress.
Gary E. Jones July 26, 2012 at 04:18 pm
Here is another $2,500,000,000 not disclosed in the cost;
http://sanfrancisco-on.us/2012/07/22/bay-area-faces-new-high-speed-rail-costs/ note the date of article is after Brown signed the deal.
Frank Geefay July 26, 2012 at 09:11 pm
BART did the same thing by hiking the sales tax for area served by the system. That is why San Jose postponed having BART for a couple of decades. Light Rail came about in part from sales taxes raised in San Jose. San Francisco subsidizes its extensive Muni system from city taxes. Our extensive highway system is subsidized by gasoline tax. As a matter of fact our VTA is in part funded by sales tax that is buried in the everyday sales tax we pay for the purchase of goods and services. This is the way governments work to raise funds for major transportation projects, by levying additional taxes or hikes in tolls for areas that will likely benefit from the system to help pay for it whether you use it or not.
This should not be a surprise to anyone because it is done so routinely. As I said earlier money will come from many sources. It has to come from somewhere. It cannot all come from the State.
Mark Burns July 26, 2012 at 10:29 pm
15 years for High Speed Rail? Not a chance. Who remembers how long it took to complete Highway 85? I do. 1950's proposed (1957 officially mapped), 1994 opened. 37 years. You don't need to correct me about the first half of 85 being done in less than half that time; we're going to be doing the same thing with the HSR between Bakersfield and Fresno.
The best idea would be to not fund it at all. It will still cost $100B+ before it is finished (I'm sticking to my $125B projection and another $125B for operations through 2100). The State should not be in the rail business. The money is coming from "Fed, State, Bonds, Etc." No, the money comes from you and me. Our legislators need to fix the budget this year, next year, etc. Then they can set up a rainy day fund (be conservative and have an account with 6 months worth of budget in it - about $65B ?). Come back with the High Speed Rail after you get that taken care of. I agree with Gary's analogy. Let's make it simple; when you can't pay the bills you have, you don't borrow more.
Gary E. Jones July 26, 2012 at 11:30 pm
Thank you Mark. Spot on bud.
Gary E. Jones July 30, 2012 at 09:34 pm
Interesting:
http://www.mercurynews.com/california-high-speed-rail/ci_21188241/bay-area-sin-city-las-vegas-bullet-train
Gary E. Jones August 17, 2012 at 03:13 pm
Does anyone else think it is strange that the high speed rail first major connection may be Las Vegas? Bakersfield has said Not in My Back Yard; so, is the next logical connection Palmdale?
Gary E. Jones August 17, 2012 at 04:19 pm
http://www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov/Bakersfield_-_Palmdale.aspx

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Cupertino Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Marc Gottlieb June 2, 2013 at 04:01 pm
PS: Ideally, everybody will be able to sign up at the college website. But I have to acknowledgeRead More that some of the language may not be perfectly as clear as we'd like, especially if this is your first enrollment. So, if you need any assistance (or maybe aren't computer-savvy) the very nice Registrar Office people can assist you on 650/574-6165. Just tell them you want to sign up for Summer semester, Real Estate Practice 110 class, Course Reference number 54642 and that you'd like to complete the enrollment today. You'll like the class, and CSM, once we get you in! ALL WELCOME! Thank you!
A Chinese-American couple will dress just like their mainstream American counterparts at the wedding.
Priyanka Sharma-Sindhar April 27, 2011 at 08:21 pm
This is definitely very useful for the those of us who aren't Chinese, but do have Chinese friends..Read More Thank you, Crystal. What are the popular spots in Cupertino for Chinese weddings?
Crystal Tai May 1, 2011 at 06:28 pm
Thank you very much for you kind words, Priyanka! The answer to your question is in another articleRead More I wrote for Cupertino Patch, "Five Wedding Reception Venues in Cupertino." Thanks again!